Life and Death Decisions

On August 19, 1989, Mark MacPhail, a former Army Ranger, worked for the Savannah Police Deparment. That night, with his wife and baby daughter at home, MacPhail was working as an off-duty as a security guard in a Burger King restaurant. When MacPhail learned of a man being assaulted in the parking lot, he intervened to defend the victim. Seven witnesses testified that they had seen Troy Anthony Davis shoot MacPhail, and two others testified that Davis had confessed to the murder. Davis, a black man, stood accused of killing MacPhail, a white police officer.

Some of the witnesses who testified at trial later recanted their sworn statements. Two of the jurors indicated that had they known 20 years ago of the facts that have surfaced since then, they would have voted differently. Nonetheless, some 20 years after he was originally sentenced to receive the death penalty, the State of Georgia ended Troy Davis’ life on September 21, 2011.

Sometimes, history entangles strange stories together. You see, back on June 7, 1998 James Byrd accepted a ride home from Shawn Berry, Lawrence Brewer and John King. Mr. Byrd knew the driver, Shawn Berry, from around town. But instead of taking him home, the three men took Mr. Byrd out into the country. They beat him viciously, urinated on him, chained his ankles to their pickup truck and dragged him for three miles. They then went to a barbeque. As you probably know, the incident took place in Jasper, Texas.

In one of those historical ironies, the State of Texas executed Lawrence Brewer on the same day Georgia executed Troy Davis. Brewer, a white supremacist, had previously served time for drug possession and burglary. He had apparently joined a white supremacist gang during this earlier prison term, and it was there that he met John King. When interviewed by the media the day before his execution and asked if he had any remorse, he said “As far as any regrets, no, I have no regrets. No, I’d do it all over again, to tell you the truth.”

As a lawyer, I think I understand the legal issues in most of these cases, and it’s hard for me to avoid the notion that the death penalty is constitutional. There are also a number of practical issues involved, like the question of deterrence and the relative cost of life imprisonment versus the total costs of carrying out the death penalty. One of those practical issues is the remarkable disparity in the racial application of the death penalty. There’s also the question, in fact the probability, that we have executed several people who were innocent of the crimes of which they were convicted. But I don’t think that answers the question, the bedrock question I’d like us to consider this morning: what kind of people do we want to be?

The scriptural witness in this regard is somewhat ambiguous, forcing us, as Scripture so often does, to struggle with the text and its meaning. Proponents of the death penalty find solace in the commandment of Leviticus: “Whoever takes the life of any human being shall be put to death” (Leviticus 24:17). (It’s worth noting, however, that the Old Testament similarly provides for the execution of those who works on the Sabbath (Exodus 31:15) or for one who curses one’s parent (Exodus 21:17) and even for a rebellious teenager (Deuteronomy 21:18-21).)

Those who oppose the death penalty can look to the notion that God has reserved vengeance for himself (Rom. 12:19). We find in the Biblical story of the first murder that God spared Cain’s life, although Abel certainly seems like an innocent victim. Chapter 8 of John’s Gospel records the only time our Savior’s encounter with capital punishment in the case of the woman caught in adultery; and Jesus put a stop to it.

It’s worth observing that there are good people, and there are people of faith, on both sides of this issue. As so often happens, we find that we must struggle with the biblical text on this issue. I think that’s a good thing, because the Bible isn’t a book of recipes that will teach us how to prepare a good life, nor is it an encyclopedia where we can go to look up the “right” answer. In Holy Scripture, God speaks to us in a collection of stories, a narrative about how people struggle to find their sanctification and how we struggle to find ours.

Three overarching themes, however, strongly suggest to me that capital punishment is the wrong answer. The first of these is an understanding of what it means to be human. We are told that we were made imago Dei, “in the image of God.” That probably doesn’t mean that our elbow looks like God’s elbow. But I think it means that all of us have some spark of the divine within, no matter how well we try to hide it. In other words, we are all instances (no matter how blurred) of something sacred and holy.

Secondly, we have the Biblical meta-narrative of God’s reaching again and again to redeem people, not because of their merit but because of His love. This happens over and over in the Bible, often enough that I believe God is trying to tell us something. We see it in the story of Cain, in the Exodus (which remains the overarching narrative for the Jewish people), in the story of David, and in the story of Christ’s calling St. Paul. Jesus preached “Do not judge, so that you may not be judged.” (Matt. 7:1.) While I’m not smart enough to have considered all of the implications of that commandment, I think at a minimum that we are not to judge the content and character of another man’s soul. God knows who can be redeemed, and I do not.

Finally, I oppose the death penalty because I honor the Christian virtue of hope. I am hopeful that God can redeem the even the shame of the murder of James Byrd, and the horror Lawrence Brewer’s unrepentant racism. I am hopeful that God’s love can reach into Brewer’s life, and into mine. I believe in “the means of grace and the hope of glory.” I think capital punishment reflects a despair at the possibility of Christ’s redemptive love reaching into the very darkest places of the human heart, and I am compelled to reject that.

In the final analysis, I think the real question is one posed by Sister Helen Prejean: “The profound moral question is not, ‘Do they deserve to die?’ but ‘Do we deserve to kill them?'” I pray the answer is no, just as I pray for Mark MacPhail, for James Byrd, for Troy Davis and Lawrence Brewer.

Shabbat Shalom,

James R. Dennis, O.P.

© 2011 James R. Dennis

18 responses to “Life and Death Decisions

  1. Thank you for helping us to think as Christians!

  2. I often feel the internal conflict warring within myself when I consider capital punishment, and while still not at home with continuing tension, I am grateful for. Brother James’s reassuring commitment to the way Jesus wants us to live. Thanks.

  3. Marjorie Thompson

    Thank you for a thoughtful analysis of some very good reasons to oppose the death penalty from a stance of Christian witness and faith. I believe the death penalty represents the human hubris of cutting off the possibility of divine redemption in a fallen human life.

    • I’m glad you liked the piece, Marjorie. It’s too easy for us to give up on people. If we could only, for an instant, see them as God does….

  4. This eloquent piece gets to the heart of moral theology and the challenge of becoming as Christ calls us to be. Each decision we make, each action we take, each word we speak, each thought we form alters, in some tiny to gigantic way, who we are as individuals and as communities.

    • I’m so glad you liked it, Lera. I like your notion that each of our decisions, actions, statements and thoughts change the fabric of the world. Lord, make us instruments of your peace….

  5. Well spoken, as usual, my brother! To both your second and third themes, irrespective of where I land theologically on this issue, there is the very practical question which a jury must answer in doling out capital punishment…something akin to, “Do you find that the Defendant is incapable of rehabilitation?”. How does a Biblically literate, God-fearing Christ-follower answer “yes” to that question? How can we ever determine that a soul is beyond God’s redemptive reach?

    • Blake,

      I don’t think we can. I think Holy Scripture teaches that we can’t, and I hope our hearts tell us that as well.

  6. Capitol punishment as a deterrent to crime has never made sense to me. As a Christian or as a (I hope) rational human being, the concept of violence being used to end violence makes no sense in my opinion. As has been said here so eloquently, my belief that in the last millisecond Christ can still redeem a lost soul, is taken away when one begins to play God. A dangerous proposition, in my way of thinking. Thank you again, Bro. James.

    • I think the notion of playing God seems a lot more attractive until one realizes that the job includes loving the unloveable, forgiving the unforgiveable and binding up all the wounds of this broken world.

  7. The decision to forbear the ultimately penalty of death, even when, and perhaps especially when, it is emotionally satisfying to inflict that penalty is a decision to place our trust in God and not our wisdom. It is also an affirmation of hope of Christ’s redeeming power.

    Like Brother James I work in the law and I know that our human institutions are simply too frail and prone to error to make such ultimate decisions.

  8. Br. James, I am grateful that you are a lawyer, an advocate for justice following the call of the Holy Spirit.

  9. After reading some of the comments, the reasons for beginning your blog should now be clear to you. You offer blessing and guidance. And it’s great to read like-minded commentary in an atmosphere that is too often narrow, cynical, and mean. I’m glad we live in the same neighborhood!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s